Internet-Draft wgchairs-socialmedia July 2023
Wicinski. (ed) Expires 27 January 2024 [Page]
Workgroup:
Network Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-tjw-wgchairs-socialmedia-00
Published:
Intended Status:
Informational
Expires:
Author:
T. Wicinski. (ed)

Social Media Suggestions for WGChairs

Abstract

This memo provides some suggestions for working group chairs in utilizing social media.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 January 2024.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

Many working groups in the IETF are focused in their length and direction. There are others which exist for a much longer period of time, especially operations groups among others. With these groups the chairs should make an effort to use other platforms than the datatracker and ietf mailing lists to make work visible.

2. Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. DNS terminology is as described in [RFC8499].

3. Long running working groups

There are several long running working groups in the IETF, and the work touches other organizations. DNSOP, HTTPBIS, TLS are just a few. With these groups, the chairs should adopt an approach of "oversharing is a good thing".

Currently a number of working groups are using github to store materials, documents being worked on, etc. But these working groups should always be looking for new avenues to promote the documents being working on in the working group.

4. Using Social Media

Currently, there is a tool to pull data from the datatracker API to automate posting into twitter [https://github.com/ietf-github-services/datatracker-tweet]. This has proven useful for working groups. DNSOP has modified this code to automate posting to Mastodon [https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/datatracker-toots].

The Working Group Chairs should take this under consideration for busy, long running working groups.

5. Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

6. Informative References

[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8499]
Hoffman, P., Sullivan, A., and K. Fujiwara, "DNS Terminology", BCP 219, RFC 8499, DOI 10.17487/RFC8499, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8499>.

Acknowledgements

Mark Nottingham for the datatracker-tweet code, and for the quote "Busy working groups should over share".

Author's Address

Tim Wicinski
Elkins, WV 26241
United States of America